The American Anti-Corruption Institute (AACI) · Institutional Policy
The AACI Medal Awards
Official Policy — Version 1.0
The American Anti-Corruption Institute (AACI) maintains this policy to protect the integrity, credibility, and institutional significance of its Medal Awards.
The policy establishes the conditions governing acceptance, professional integrity, permitted use, review, and possible revocation of The AACI Medals.
It applies to all three medal levels and their approved recognition areas, subject to the effective date, the terms accepted by each recipient, and applicable law.
Acceptance of an AACI Medal is voluntary.
Before receiving the medal, the recipient is required to sign The AACI Medal Awards — Recipient Acceptance and Acknowledgment, confirming acceptance of the applicable terms and conditions.
The recipient shall be provided with the relevant policy and a reasonable opportunity to review its provisions before signing.
The signed acknowledgment shall identify the applicable policy title, version number, and effective date.
The AACI shall retain the acknowledgment in its internal institutional records.
Recipients are expected to uphold standards of professional integrity consistent with the purpose and significance of their institutional distinction.
Recipients shall not knowingly misrepresent the nature of the award or use it to imply that The AACI has approved, certified, accredited, or endorsed their professional activities, services, business interests, or affiliated institutions.
The AACI Medal does not confer authority to act or speak on behalf of The AACI.
Recipients are expected to refrain from conduct that materially undermines the integrity of the recognition.
The AACI may initiate a review when credible information raises material concerns involving:
A complaint, allegation, media report, or pending investigation shall not, by itself, establish misconduct or automatically result in revocation.
The AACI shall assess the credibility, relevance, and reliability of the information before determining whether further review is justified.
Any proposed revocation shall follow an established institutional process designed to provide procedural fairness and protect the integrity of the decision.
The procedure shall include, as appropriate:
The AACI shall distinguish between substantiated findings, unresolved allegations, and circumstances that do not justify institutional action.
The AACI may revoke a medal when the authorized decision-making body determines, following the applicable procedure, that reliable evidence establishes grounds for revocation.
The decision shall consider the seriousness of the conduct, its relationship to the original award, the reliability of the evidence, and the proportionality of revocation.
Any revocation shall be formally documented and communicated to the recipient in writing.
Following final revocation of an AACI Medal, the recipient shall:
The AACI shall provide reasonable return instructions and an appropriate period for compliance.
The AACI’s final decision to revoke an award remains valid even if the recipient does not return the physical medal or the original Official Letter of Award.
The AACI does not maintain a publicly accessible list or directory of medal recipients.
Award nominations, evaluations, institutional decisions, recipient acknowledgments, and related records are maintained internally, subject to applicable confidentiality and privacy requirements.
Revocation reviews and decisions shall also be handled confidentially, except where disclosure is required by applicable law or the recipient has authorized confirmation of the award’s current status under the verification procedure below.
The AACI shall maintain accurate internal records of the status of its awards.
A third party seeking to verify a claimed AACI Medal should ask the individual claiming the award to request official confirmation from The AACI.
An AACI Medal recipient may request an official verification letter confirming the authenticity and current status of their award for a designated third party.
The recipient must submit a written request identifying the third party, authorize The AACI to disclose the actual current status of the award, including any unfavorable verification result, and pay the applicable administrative fee.
The AACI shall verify the award against its official institutional records. Payment of the administrative fee does not guarantee a favorable verification result.
Upon completion of the verification process, The AACI shall:
The third party shall not be required to submit a verification request or make any payment to The AACI.
The AACI shall communicate the applicable administrative fee, payment conditions, and any delivery charges to the recipient before processing the request.
Each approved version of this policy shall identify:
The AACI shall retain previous approved policy versions in its institutional records.
A recipient’s signed acknowledgment shall identify the version of the policy accepted at the time of the award.
Subsequent policy amendments shall not automatically impose new material contractual obligations on existing recipients without their agreement, except where otherwise permitted or required by applicable law.
This policy shall be administered in accordance with The AACI’s approved institutional governance procedures and in compliance with applicable legal requirements.
The AACI reserves the right to protect its name, institutional identity, and recognition program against unauthorized representation or misuse through appropriate and lawful means.